Legal Opinion

Dodson v. City of Bend

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Banc.

This is an appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant City for damages

Costs, 15 C.J., p. 272, n. 63 New. Municipal Corporations, 28 Cyc., p. 1387, n. 4, p. 1465, n. 34, 36, p. 1467, n. 45. Pleading, 31 Cyc., p. 79, n. 4, p. 82, n. 11, p. 352, n. 52, p. 367, n. 1, p. 368, n. 9, p. 391, n. 23, 24. Trial, 38 Cyc., p. 1360, n. 51, p. 1369, n. 33, p. 1565, n. 78. sustained by the plaintiff resulting from a defective sidewalk. The defendant appeals and defines the issues on appeal as follows:

"The complaint filed in this case and upon which the Plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robison v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bishop v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. York v. NashOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AMCA Lumber Co. v. Buckeye-Pacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dodson v. City of BendOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API