Legal Opinion

State v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 7228SC629Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is based on his exception to the entry of the judgment, therefore, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. State v. Martin, 10 N.C. App. 181, 178 S.E. 2d 32 (1970).

A careful review of the record reveals no error. The bill of indictment is proper in form; the defendant’s plea of guilty to a less degree of the offense charged in the indictment against him is authorized by statute; State v. Woody, 271 N.C. 544, 157 S.E. 2d 108 (1967) ; defendant was represented by an experienced attorney; the court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API