Legal Opinion

Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate Agency

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1998No. 995-E-409G; CA A95785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a contested case proceeding in which the Real Estate Agency found that, in 47 separate instances, petitioner had acted in the capacity of an escrow agent without being licensed to do so. Based on that finding, the Agency ordered petitioner to pay $23,100 in civil penalties. We affirm.

The Agency made the following findings of fact, based on the parties’ stipulation. Petitioner is a mortgage broker and is not licensed to conduct escrow activity in Oregon. At the time of the activities at issue, Jeff Paget was employed by petitioner. Paget does not hold a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dinkins v. Board of AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. McKay v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Centennial School District No. 28J v. Oregon Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API