Legal Opinion

Paradise v. Ridley

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 28, 1940Published

1Per curiam

The rule that an award of alimony and counsel fee exempts a husband from further common-law liability therefor *730(Turner v. Woolworth, 221 N. Y. 425), does not apply where same is denied upon motion pendente lite and the action is discontinued. (Elder v. Rosenwasser, 238 N. Y. 427; Dravecka v. Richard, 267 id. 180; Goldberg v. Keller, 236 App. Div. 541; Ehrlich v. McKee, 170 Misc. 222; affd., 258 App. Div. 715.) In the absence of special agreement upon which a discontinuance is based in no sense is such a termination of an action conclusive upon the parties, or their attorneys, of the merits of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Elder v. . RosenwasserNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Naumer v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Goldberg v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API