United States v. Castro-Rivera
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.*
Jose Castro-Rivera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Castro-Rivera contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Castro-Rivera maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004