Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Sperry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1930No. 21962. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action for recovery on a promissory note and to foreclose the mortgage securing same. The cause was tried to the court, resulting in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants Sperry, indorsers on the note, alone have appealed.

Leo H. Travenshek and wife, on October 15, 1927, executed a promissory note, secured by a real property mortgage, for nine hundred and fifty dollars, payable to appellants Sperry in monthly installments. Under the terms of the note, the holder had the option of de- daring the whole sum due in the event of default in the payment of any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chamberlain v. CobbWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bardshar v. ChaffeeWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Ins. v. VarnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Melvin Gelman v. Public National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Aisted v. GrimWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API