Legal Opinion
Etienne v. National Auto. Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided August 9, 1999No. 98-1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
747 So.2d 593 (1999)
Jules ETIENNE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. & Carrie Sebastien, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 98-1946.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
June 23, 1999.
Clarifying Decision On Rehearing August 9, 1999.
Bennett Boyd Anderson, Jr., Lafayette, for Jules Etienne, Sr.
Arthur C. Reuter, Jr., New Orleans, for National Automobile Insurance Company.
Before PETERS, AMY and GREMILLION, Judges.
AMY, Judge.
In this tort matter, the defendant law firm appeals the trial court's denial of its peremptory exceptions of prescription and no cause of action.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Peters; Concurrence · Peters.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Dubuclet v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Etienne v. National Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Lehmann v. GE Global Insurance Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Foltmer v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Jeansonne v. New York Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Marchand v. AsbestosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.