Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1915No. 3538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

The indictment against appellant contained two counts, one charging him with forgery and the other with passing a forged instrument. When tried he was found guilty under the second count in the indictment, the one charging him with passing a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

In the first count in the indictment, a motion to quash the indictment would show it charged that appellant did make a false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of Bobert Lundell, while the alleged false instrument is set forth in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Lafferty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API