Legal Opinion

Sannon-Stamm Associates, Inc. v. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The doctrine of res judicata may be invoked in instances of claim splitting to prohibit a plaintiff from bringing an action for only part of his claim; the judgment obtained in that action would preclude him from bringing a second action for the residue of the claim (see Stoner v Culligan, Inc., 32 AD2d 170, 171-172 [1969]).

Here, however, since the issues relating to the nonpayment of the subsequent installments of the placement fee had not matured when the Civil Court action was brought for nonpayment of the first installment of the referral fee, and consequently had never been litigated,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stoner v. Culligan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Gelb v. HattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. 1050 Tenants Corp. v. LapidusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Genger ex rel. AG Properties Co. v. SharonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Kanciper v. Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Matter of Police Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. Matter of Police Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API