Legal Opinion

State v. Clemmons

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1998No. CR 98-296PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Maurice Clemmons acquired four felony convictions and a revocation of probation during a period from September 1989 to mid-February 1990, and all five of those proceedings became the subject matter of Clemmons’s application for writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District, in 1996. See Clemmons v. Norris, PB-C-96-19 slip op. (F.3d March 26, 1996). In the federal proceeding, the district court, relying largely on Robinson v. Norris, 60 F.3d 457 (8th Cir. 1995), held Clemmons’s right to counsel was violated in each of the five state…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Robert Sherman Robinson v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Seeco, Inc. v. HalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. State v. HerredSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Chenowith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Irvin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. State v. HardinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API