Legal Opinion
United States v. Lee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 30, 2018No. 17-2537PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barrett, Circuit Judge.
Kash Lee appeals the sentence he received when his supervised release was revoked. He faults the district court for not addressing what he now characterizes as his principal argument in mitigation: that a longer sentence would unjustifiably subject him to harsher treatment than similarly situated defendants. But Lee did not make this argument in the district court, so the district court had no obligation to address it. Lee also complains that the district court failed to fill out a form stating the reasons for his sentence. It is not clear that a district court has an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Chavez-Meza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Morales-NegronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Derrick IngramCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Anthony MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Anthony MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.