Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Pitsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2002Published

1DissentWisner, J.

I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority to hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Oswego County Court for further proceedings. “After a defendant has been convicted on plea of guilty or after trial, the People are not required to assume the burden of establishing that what was done was regular in the absence of evidence to the contrary” (People v Smyth, 3 NY2d 184, 187, rearg denied 3 NY2d 942). The First, Second and Third Departments thus have held that the conclusory assertion of a defendant that he was not present at a pretrial Sandoval hearing, if…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SmythNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. AugustineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API