Legal Opinion

City of Louisiana v. Lang

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 28, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Louisiana Court of Common Pleas.— Son. David S. Eby, Judge. Transferred to the St. Louis Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, C.

A jury in the Louisiana Court of Common Pleas assessed a penalty of fifty dollars *665against defendant for violating’ an ordinance of the city of Louisiana which prohibits itinerant merchants from plying their vocation in that city without license. On the trial there was evidence tending to support the complaint. The evidence conflicted on the question whether defendant received his supplies from Chicago or St. Louis.

Jurisdiction: constitutional How Preserved. This court has no jurisdiction of this case. The demurrer to the complaint and the objection to the reception of any evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. State ex inf. Crow v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Dulaney v. BuffumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Rose v. JobSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State ex rel. School District v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Village of Grandview v. McElroySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Lovins v. City of St. Louis.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Harris v. GogginsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. State v. HartmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Associated Holding Co. v. W. B. Kelley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API