Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1964No. 16496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

The case is one requiring a determination of the meaning of an “exclusion” clause in a Texas Standard Form automobile liability insurance policy. The question to be resolved is whether, under the state of facts properly deemed to have been actually found by the trial court, the loss and damage from fire sustained by the owner of real and personal property (and such person’s subrogee, the Employers Mutual Casualty Company) was or was not covered by the automobile liability insurance policy of him who was negligently responsible for the fire.

The real property with which we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ætna Ins. Co. v. Houston Oil & Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Cohen & Powell, Inc. v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. National Fire Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Houston Oil & Transport Co. v. Ætna Ins.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stewart Warner Corporation v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Garnishee-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Huron Bowl, Inc. v. Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Maderas Tratadas, Inc. v. Sun Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2012
  4. Maderas Tratadas, Inc. v. Sun Alliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API