Utah Power & Light Co. v. Campbell
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
Four members of the Court have determined to give Utah Power & Light Company (UP&L) the advisory opinion for which it asks, and I much doubt that anything can be said which will dissuade them. Accordingly, my observations will be short and pointed.
Initially I note that our focus of our attention is on the Snake River and the City of Idaho Falls, through which the Snake River courses. Thus, we have here a latter-day “River City,” and we have the “Music Man” (in the form of UP&L) preaching that we have trouble, big trouble, right here in River City. The trouble is that more people are on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Village of Moyie Springs v. Aurora Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Helco Products Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.