Legal Opinion · Dissent

Utah Power & Light Co. v. Campbell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1985No. 15944Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

Four members of the Court have determined to give Utah Power & Light Company (UP&L) the advisory opinion for which it asks, and I much doubt that anything can be said which will dissuade them. Accordingly, my observations will be short and pointed.

Initially I note that our focus of our attention is on the Snake River and the City of Idaho Falls, through which the Snake River courses. Thus, we have here a latter-day “River City,” and we have the “Music Man” (in the form of UP&L) preaching that we have trouble, big trouble, right here in River City. The trouble is that more people are on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Miller v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Village of Moyie Springs v. Aurora Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Helco Products Co. v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API