Mulligan v. Jersey Truck Renters
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchwartzwald, J.
Defendant moves to set aside the service of the summons herein which was served upon the defendant, pursuant to section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
The complaint alleges that the defendant, its agents, servants and/or employees conducted themselves so carelessly and negligently that a large sheet of cardboard, which they were unloading “ was caused to and did strike the plaintiff ”, who was passing by at the time. The question before the court is whether an “ accident ” of this nature comes within the purview of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Section 52 of the Vehicle and…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Argentina v. Emery World Wide Delivery Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- McDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Schefke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Aranzullo v. Collins Packing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Brown v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc., Eastern StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.