Legal Opinion

Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1929No. 5326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGiyens, J.

— Respondent moves to strike appellant’s brief and the transcript because respondent claims that as to the transcript the only appellant who has appealed (El dridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users’ Assn., 48 Ida. 182, 279 Pac. 713) has an appeal only from and upon the judgment-roll; and as to the brief that it still carries in its title the name of the appellant heretofore eliminated from the appeal (Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users’ Assn., supra) and that appellant enumerates and relies upon errors not now available to him.

The determination of respondent’s contention as to the limited…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users' Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users' Assn.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API