Legal Opinion

Richards v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1954No. 16916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

Respondent was shopping in the large retail store of the corporate appellant (the personal appellant was the store-manager) when she fell backward over boxes containing butter and cottage cheese, and received personal injuries for which she brought this action' for actual and punitive damages. The boxes had shortly before been delivered by Armour & Company and placed against the counter of the dairy products department, but in the aisle which customers used to approach the coffee counter. Respondent had already made several purchases in the store and had them in a pushcart,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Brinkworth v. Sam Seelig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Bagwell v. McLellan Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Ginns v. C. T. Sherer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Finnegan v. the Goerke Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baker v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Benjamin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  3. Baker v. Toys-R-US IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  4. Laing v. Truist BankDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  5. Patterson v. Wal-Mart Stores East LPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API