Legal Opinion
Hughes Tool Co. v. Fielding
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
Plaintiff moves for an order striking out four affirmative defenses. Defendants cross-move for judgment on the pleadings.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment and an injunction. The action seeks the determination of a question of law to the effect that an exhibitor of a motion picture licensed by the State of Hew York in accordance with the provisions of article 43 of the Education Law is not subject to prosecution under section 1140-a of the Penal Law, nor may a motion-picture theatre license be revoked because of the exhibition of such a licensed film.
Defendants’ motion for judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- New York Post Corp. v. KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- City of Lynchburg v. Dominion Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- MATTER OF JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Erie County Water Authority v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. McCaffreyNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Caamano v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- In re Shannon B.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.