Crygier v. United States
United States Court of Claims
On the Proofs. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. On the 1st of October, 1874, John U. Orygier was appointed a cadet-engineer in the Navy; completed his course of instruction at the Naval Academy, and was detached therefrom on the 10th of June, 1879. On the 5th of July, 1879, pursuant to orders, he reported for duty on the United States ship Marion, South Atlantic Station, on which vessel he served until…
Read the full summary
On the Proofs. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. On the 1st of October, 1874, John U. Orygier was appointed a cadet-engineer in the Navy; completed his course of instruction at the Naval Academy, and was detached therefrom on the 10th of June, 1879. On the 5th of July, 1879, pursuant to orders, he reported for duty on the United States ship Marion, South Atlantic Station, on which vessel he served until June 25,1882, when he was detached at Montevideo and ordered home, in pursuance of the recomihendation of a board of…
1Opinion of the CourtWeldon, J.
In this suit, the petitioner claims the sum of $2,252.09, for the increased pay of decedent, as, an assistant engineer in the Navy, from the 5 th of December, Í881, to the time of his death, in August, 1885.
The facts are briefly as follows : On the 1st of October, 1874, the decedent was appointed a cadet engineer in the Navy, and completed his course of instruction at the Academy on the 10th day of June, 1879. On the 5th day of July, 1879, he reported for duty on board the ship Marion, on which he served until June 25, 1882, when he was detached and ordered home because *272of physical…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Perkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1885