Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Furness

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1987No. 06A01-8610-CV-267Published

1Opinion of the Court

504 N.E.2d 336 (1987)

James M. RIDENOUR, As Director of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Defendant-Appellant, and Michigan City Charter Boat Association, Intervenor-Appellant,

v.

Clay FURNESS, Chris Furness, Jeff Furness, Mike Brazinski, Harold Bucy, Chris Camalick, Clem Cho, Bill Dickerson, John Hart, Lance Kaeding, Tom Mayoch, and Howard Westerman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Phil Smidt & Son, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor.

No. 06A01-8610-CV-267.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District.

February 26, 1987.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1987.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael Schaefer,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. New York Ex Rel. Kennedy v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Indiana State Department of Welfare v. StagnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API