Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 26, 1991No. 05-90-01147-CRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

A jury convicted Craig Eugene Anderson of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. The trial court assessed a forty-year sentence. In three points of error, appellant contends: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; and (2) the State impermissibly commented on his failure to testify. We hold the State improperly referred to appellant’s failure to testify. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.

FACTS

The complainant testified the robbery occurred at a convenience store. After he had bought gasoline and returned to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Dickinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Redwine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Prihoda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  3. David Lee Criff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  4. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Hester v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API