Legal Opinion

Consolidated Auto Warranty Corp. v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided January 13, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 9481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GROOMS, District Judge.

There has been submitted to the Court a motion to strike the amendment to the complaint filed herein on October 20, 1959. This amendment seeks to recover under the provision of the Georgia statute, § 56-706, a penalty and attorneys’ fees for alleged bad faith failure to pay an insurance loss. The parties have submitted memorandum briefs which the Court has carefully considered. The Court has also independently researched this question. The issue presented is whether the Georgia statute has any extraterritorial operation.

It is said in 14 American Jurisprudence, p. 419, §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Cortez Cigar Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Alliance Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Kline Bros. v. Royal Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Insurance Company of North America v. Kay Frances DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API