Legal Opinion

Cuesta v. Royal Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 27, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Berry. City court of Atlanta. November term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Chief Justice.

This was an action upon a policy of insurance, dated March 24, 1893, which insured the plaintiff for one year from that date against “all direct loss or damage by fire” on his store and office furniture and fixtures contained in the three-story brick tin-roof building, - No. 2 Marietta street, Atlanta, Ga. At the conclusion of the evidence for the plaintiff, the defendant moved for a nonsuit, upon the ground that the loss complained of was not a direct loss hy fire. The motion was sustained, and the plaintiff excepted.

It appears from the evidence, that the fire took…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Preferred Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Automobile Insurance v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Western Assur. Co. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Ovbey v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API