Bell v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Justice.
Jerry K. Bell appeals from a judgment construing a deed to be a mortgage rather than a conveyance. By his sole point of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in holding that he did not possess a fee simple interest in the property. Appellant contends that there is no evidence to support the conclusion that the deed was intended only as a mortgage. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The deed in question purports to convey a fee simple interest to both the appellant and the appellees, who are appellant’s son and daughter-in-law. Each of these parties is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. AtwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Bantuelle v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Gulf Interstate Engineering Co. v. Pecos Pipeline & Producing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.