Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1986No. 14586Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

Jerry K. Bell appeals from a judgment construing a deed to be a mortgage rather than a conveyance. By his sole point of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred in holding that he did not possess a fee simple interest in the property. Appellant contends that there is no evidence to support the conclusion that the deed was intended only as a mortgage. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The deed in question purports to convey a fee simple interest to both the appellant and the appellees, who are appellant’s son and daughter-in-law. Each of these parties is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. AtwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bantuelle v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Gulf Interstate Engineering Co. v. Pecos Pipeline & Producing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API