Legal Opinion

People v. Leal

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2009No. B211365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

Appellant Saqueo L. Leal entered a residence through an open window in the middle of the night and digitally penetrated a woman as she slept in bed next to her husband. Believing that appellant was her husband, the woman did not resist and submitted to sexual intercourse. Appellant was subsequently convicted of rape and sexual penetration by artifice, pretense or concealment (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 261, subd. (a)(5), 289, subd. (f)), and assault with intent to commit rape (§ 220, subd. (a)). 2 He was sentenced to six years in state prison.

Appellant contends the evidence is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Fleming, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Burton CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API