Legal Opinion
Smith v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1938No. 16949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Judge.
On March 1, 1922, Clement Smith caused the defendant to issue to him a policy of industrial life insurance in the sum of $400 in which he designated his wife, Charlotte Dent Smith, the appellant, as beneficiary. The premiums on said policy -were paid from the date of its issuance through March 31, 1933, when they were discontinued and the policy was accordingly lapsed. In conformity with the provisions of the laws of this State, viz.: Act No. 193 of 1906 as amended by Act No. 57 of 1932, the policy of insurance provided for the accumulation of a reserve which became effective…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Board of Assessors of the Parish v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Starratt v. MullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Bach v. Western States Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Battle, Admrx. v. Prud. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Smith v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940