Legal Opinion

Rakita v. Rose

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 30, 1989No. 88-1446, 88-1550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

547 So.2d 154 (1989)

Nathan J. RAKITA and Rose C. Forman and Southeast Bank, N.A., As Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Harry Forman, Deceased, Appellants,

v.

Richard A. ROSE, Appellee.

Nos. 88-1446, 88-1550.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1989.

Rehearing Denied September 5, 1989.

McDermott, Will & Emery and James E. Betke, Lawrence R. Metsch, and John Schriver, Chicago, Ill., for the Estate of Harry Forman and its co-personal representatives/appellants; Herzfeld and Rubin and Myron Shapiro and Judy D. Shapiro, Miami, for appellant Forman, individually.

Grutman…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glass v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Lohr v. ByrdSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. SommerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Blanford v. Polk CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Gerstel v. ArensSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levitt-Ansca Towne Park Partnership v. Smith & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. MMH VENTURE v. Masterpiece Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Espirito Santo Bank of Florida v. Agronomics Finance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Ruskin v. RyanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Pierre-Louis v. AlfredDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API