Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watkins v. County of Alameda

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 2009No. A122992, A123320Published

1Dissent

POLLAK, J., Dissenting

As set out in the majority opinion, the County of Alameda and its agents and agencies (collectively, the county) have appealed a writ of mandate issued at the behest of several residents of Alameda County who are recipients of general assistance (GA). The writ directs the county to discontinue the time limitation of GA benefits to otherwise qualified persons who are unemployable for reasons other than physical, mental or emotional incapacity, or their age. The appeal questions the meaning of an “employable individual” as that term is used in Welfare and Institutions Code…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API