Camps v. Cardenas
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The final judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (1) the trial court’s refusal to dismiss the mechanics lien count of the operative complaint, although error, was harmless because: (a) the trial court never ruled on the mechanics lien count and never foreclosed such lien in the final judgment, (b) the trial court still had subject matter jurisdiction over the remaining counts of the operative complaint by virtue of a valid good faith claim for an equitable lien pled in said complaint, Crane Co. v. Fine, 221 So.2d 145 (Fla.1969); Green v. Putnam, 93 So.2d 378 (Fla.1957);…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crane Co. v. FineSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Emery v. International Glass & Mfg., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Green v. PutnamSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- TUTTLE/WHITE CONSTRUCTIONS, INC. v. Hughes Supply, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Tomayko v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMahan Construction Co. v. Carol's Care Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- McMAHAN CONST. CO. v. CAROL'S CARE CTR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984