Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1992No. 18A05-9201-CR-8PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Judge.

Following a bench trial Defendant-Appellant Stancel Hammond was found guilty of conspiracy to deal in cocaine as a Class B felony 1 and possession of cocaine as a Class D felony. 2 Hammond now appeals his conviction raising four issues for our review which we rephrase as follows:

1) Did the trial court err in finding that Hammond had waived his right to a trial by jury?

2) Did the trial court err in denying Hammond's motion to suppress evidence?

3) Did the trial court err in denying Hammond's motion for a mistrial?

4) Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the convictions?

We affirm.

O…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Green v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Robey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Chambers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. McClendon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Dickenson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Matter of EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API