Otto Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Claimant appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying her benefits on the ground that her discharge by the employer was due to willful misconduct under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(e).
Claimant had been employed by the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Scranton, Pennsylvania, as a secretary, for more than four and a half years. On September 14, 1956, she was discharged by the office manager because of her refusal to obey her employer’s instructions to assist another employe in the latter’s work.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Moyer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gaunce v. BOARD OF LABOR APPEALS, EMP. SEC. DIV.Montana Supreme Court · 1974
- Fritsche Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Urban Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962