Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Emerick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1933No. Appeal 12PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

The court below made absolute a rule to open a judgment on a non-negotiable judgment note, dated July 26, 1930, in the sum of $100. Depositions were taken in support of the rule by the petitioner but no testimony was offered by 'respondent, The depositions in support of the rule estab lished that C. B. McCarty, of - Columbus, Ohio, the original payee of the judgment note, represented to George H. Emerick, defendant, and others, that he was in the business of selling Belgian stallions; that he sold to an association of men, of whom George Emerick was one, a registered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Klopfer v. EkisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Wade v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenblum v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API