Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Detention of Petersen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1999No. 65866-8Published

1DissentSanders, J.

(dissenting) — The majority consigns Mr. Petersen to indefinite imprisonment without benefit of appeal or right to counsel. It claims the civil nature of his incarceration diminishes his rights below those enjoyed by convicted criminals. It holds the United States Supreme *96Court’s interpretation of a similar statute is “simply wrong.” Majority at 79. It states the legislature’s guarantee of the right to counsel “[a]t all stages of the proceedings” does not mean what it says and that there is no constitutional right to counsel for one potentially deprived of his liberty in a civil proceeding.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API