Legal Opinion
Caine v. Payne
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 5, 1951No. 10913PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.
National Savings and Trust Company sued for construction of the residuary clause of a will under which it was trustee. The residuum was in the trustee’s possession, ready for distribution. Appellant and appellees were opposing claimants. As such, they were joined as defendants. The controversy was solely between the two parties. The District Court adjudged in favor of the present appellees. This court reversed, deciding in favor of the present appellant. Caine v. Payne, 1950, 86 U.S. App.D.C. 404, 182 F.2d 246. Upon remand of the case, the District Court allowed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. KaltenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- McCormick v. ElseaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Abbott, Puller & Myers v. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Caine v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Geiger v. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mary W. Walsh v. National Savings & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. LongDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Christopher v. KrausDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mary W. Walsh v. National Savings & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Mary W. Walsh v. National Savings & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957