Legal Opinion

Pederson v. Thoeny

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1930No. 6,715PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action to recover damages for the conversion of a motor-truck and an undivided one-half interest in six head of cattle. The jury found in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants Ben Olson, Alice M. and J. M. Thoeny. The Honorable S. E. Paul, Judge of the Twentieth Judicial District, presided at the trial. Affidavit of disqualification was thereafter filed against him, and the Honorable C. B. Elwell, Judge of the Eighteenth District, was called in to hear the motion for new trial. A new trial was granted. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment and from the order granting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Child & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. McCormick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Ott v. PaceMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Westlake v. OsborneMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Avco Financial Services v. Foreman-DonovanMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Double X Ranch, Inc. v. Savage BrothersMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Avco Financial Services v. ForemanMontana Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API