Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 15, 1981No. 80-644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Judge.

The record implicates appellant in two robberies. Separate incriminating statements were given by him as to each robbery. This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress statements made as to one of those robberies. Because of the grounds upon which we reverse, it is not necessary to consider the possible interrelationships between either the substantive or the procedural aspects of the two crimes, except those specifically mentioned here.

Appellant was advised of his Miranda rights at the time of his arrest. Subsequently, at the police station, Miranda rights were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Singleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Free Bond, Inc. v. Comaza International, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PadronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Luman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Isaac-Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API