Legal Opinion

Arkansas State Board of Optometry v. Dodge

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 1946No. 4-7993Published

1Opinion of the Court

MtNou W. Millwee, Justice.

The petitioners, Eitholz, make application here for a writ of prohibition directed io the judge of the Pulaski Chancery Court to restrain said court from proceeding against them in a cause instituted by the Arkansas State Board of Optometry wherein petitioners are charged with contempt of the Chancery Court by repeated violations of its injunctive orders. In a separate petition the Board of Optometry seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Chancellor to assume and exercise jurisdiction in said contempt proceeding over certain residents of Jefferson and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API