In re the Estate of Birsten
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marie M. Lambert, S.
In this Public Administrator’s accounting, a hearing on the issue of kinship of alleged distributees has been concluded. Reserved for determination was the question of the admissibility of foreign documents not authenticated pursuant to CPLR 4542. Mr. Broydes, an attorney admitted to the Bars of New *346York and Warsaw, Poland, testified on behalf of the alleged distributees regarding the documents issued by the Polish Government.
Prior to the amendment of CPLR 4542 in 1969 (Fifteen Ann Report of NY Judicial Conference, 1970, pp A125, A126, eff Sept. 1,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- De Yong v. De YongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garcia v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In re the Estate of EggersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984
- Garcia v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006