Legal Opinion
Pierson v. Hernandez
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 12, 2009No. 27250-8-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
202 P.3d 1014 (2009)
Traci PIERSON, Appellant,
v.
Arnoldo HERNANDEZ, Respondent.
No. 27250-8-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
March 12, 2009.
Stewart Robert Smith, Lacy & Kane PS, East Wenatchee, WA, for Respondent.
Robert William Sealby, Carlson McMahon & Sealby PLLC, Wenatchee, WA, for Appellant.
SCHULTHEIS, C.J.
¶ 1 RCW 4.84.250 relevantly provides that attorney fees are available to a prevailing party in cases "where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party . . . is [$10,000] or less." We must decide whether plaintiff Traci Pierson pleaded a claim in excess of $10,000 through her…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Wagg v. Estate of DunhamWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Wagg v. Estate of DunhamWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Beckmann v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kovacs v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Flores v. Safeway IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Kovacs v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Kovacs v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2016