Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Kent

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1954No. 33214PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

This appeal from the trial court’s order, after appeal from the probate court, denying probate of the will and a purported codicil of Charles W. Kent, deceased, involves the validity of these instruments. The issues are before us for consideration by reason of a freehold being involved, the decedent being possessed of extensive real estate in the city of Peoria at the time of his death. We find it unnecessary to discuss the details concerning the provisions of the instruments, the persons named therein, and the quantum of the estate.

In 1923, the decedent executed his last will which complied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sup v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Judy v. JudyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gump v. GowansIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carnahan v. McKinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. White v. Conference Endowment CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Estate of StolteIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Berndtson v. HeubergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API