Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamid

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1987No. 85-1639Published

1Opinion of the Court

531 A.2d 628 (1987)

UNITED STATES, Appellant,

v.

Abdul HAMID, a/k/a Hilvan Jude Finch, Appellee.

No. 85-1639.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued September 23, 1986.

Decided September 15, 1987.

Ilene G. Rosenthal, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Paul L. Knight, and Judith Hetherton, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellant.

Greta C. Van Susteren, with whom Timothy Junkin, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for appellee.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and MACK and FERREN, Associate Judges.

MACK, Associate Judge:

The government…

Also in this document: Dissent · Cranch; Dissent · Pryor.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API