Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Joseph. (Pealer, J.) Bill filed to construe a lease. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplih, J.

The complainants are the owners of a certain flouring mill at Constantine, Michigan, operated by water-power. The defendant is a corporation owning a water-power at Constantine, and is known as the Constantine Hydraulic Company. A portion of its power is used by the complainants in operating their mill. The company was incorporated under a special act of the Legislature approved March 25,1867. It afterwards erected a dam across St. Joseph river, and built a system of races on both sides thereof, the work being completed in 1873. The facts preceding the filing of the bill, briefly stated, are…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Eames v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API