Harponola Co. v. Conkin

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

In this case, this court, on November 2, 1923, struck from the record herein the bill of exceptions. That being true, the only question now left for this court to consider is whether or not the pleadings support the judgment which dismissed appellant’s petition. Forgy and Wells v. Rapier Sugar Feed Company, 191 Ky. 416; Martin v. White, 193 Ky. 610.

In its petition, the appellant sued on a promissory note, averring that it was the owner of said note in due course for a valuable consideration. The note was filed as an exhibit and disclosed that it…