Rikard v. Rikard
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This involves the third divorce between the parties.
The husband appeals, and the sole question presented for review is whether, under the evidence in the case, the parties reconciled two days after the divorce complaint was filed by the wife.
If the parties so reconciled, the effect in Alabama is clear, for a reconciliation between the parties in a pending divorce action abrogates the cause of action; and, ordinarily, the only allowable judgment thereafter is one dismissing the cause.McNutt v. Beaty, 370 So.2d 998 (Ala. 1979); James v. James,369 So.2d 811 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). Thus, in this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McNutt v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Keller v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- James v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bright v. BrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Massengill v. MassengillCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Sola v. SolaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Sola v. SolaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012