Legal Opinion

Rikard v. Rikard

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 6, 1980No. Civ. 2257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This involves the third divorce between the parties.

The husband appeals, and the sole question presented for review is whether, under the evidence in the case, the parties reconciled two days after the divorce complaint was filed by the wife.

If the parties so reconciled, the effect in Alabama is clear, for a reconciliation between the parties in a pending divorce action abrogates the cause of action; and, ordinarily, the only allowable judgment thereafter is one dismissing the cause.McNutt v. Beaty, 370 So.2d 998 (Ala. 1979); James v. James,369 So.2d 811 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). Thus, in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNutt v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Keller v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. James v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bright v. BrightCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Massengill v. MassengillCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Jones v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Sola v. SolaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. Sola v. SolaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API