Legal Opinion
Shawnee Tribe v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 30, 2004No. 03-2042-GTVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VANBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
This case arises out of the impending disposal by the United States government of the Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant (“SFAAP”), a 9,065-acre parcel of land located near DeSoto, Kansas. The United States has declared the SFAAP to be excess property available for disposal pursuant to the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, 40 U.S.C. § 471 et seq. Plaintiff Shawnee Tribe 1 contends that the property is located within the boundaries of the Shawnee Indian reservation, thus the Tribe applied to the General Services…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Shawnee Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005