Cullen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an indictment which charged them with using the mails in a scheme to defraud, in violation of section 215 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10385). It is contended that it was error to deny their motions for instructed verdicts of acquittal.
So far as the defendants Cullen and Dennison are concerned, the evidence was amply sufficient to justify the submission of the ease to the jury. They purchased at $3.25 per acre 1,120 acres of land, which they had never seen, and they organized a corporation, known as Great Angelus Oil & Land…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Worden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Wilkes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Liu v. BarreletDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025