Saulsberry v. Thomasville Feed & Seed, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice
For reasons I previously have expressed, I believe that this Court’s holdings in Ex parte Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., 954 So.2d 583, 587 (Ala.*9442006), and in Ex parte Suzuki Mobile, Inc., 940 So.2d 1007, 1010 (Ala.2006), construing the phrase “events or omissions giving rise to the claim” in Ala.Code 1975, § 6-3-7(a)(1), as meaning “the acts or omissions of the corporate defendant” is incorrect. See Ex parte Ford Motor Co., 73 So.3d 597, 605-06 (Ala.2011) (Murdock, J., dissenting); Ex parte Ford Motor Co., 47 So.3d 234, 241 (Ala.2010) (Murdock, J., concurring in the result). Under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte Suzuki Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Siniard v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Maddox v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011