Legal Opinion

Wright v. . Storrs

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavies, J.

The defendant, Storrs, is the survivor of the firm of D. Burgess & Go., and the defendant Paine is the administrator of the deceased member of the firm,'D. Burgess. The action is commenced to recover the indebtedness of the firm to the plaintiff for moneys loaned, &c. ISTo objection was taken to the defendants, or to two causes of action being united in one suit, and none is now made.

The judge who tried the action, without a jury, found the ' following facts:

That before, on and after the 23d day of February, 1856, Daniel Burgess and the defendant Storrs were copartners, carrying on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chester v. . the Bank of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Catts v. ClementsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1881
  3. Catts v. ClementsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1881
  4. Wallace & Sons v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API