Legal Opinion

Filippo v. REAL ESTATE COM'N OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1966No. 3850Published

1Opinion of the Court

223 A.2d 268 (1966)

Joseph FILIPPO, Petitioner,

v.

REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.

No. 3850.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued June 20, 1966.

Decided October 19, 1966.

James C. Cawood, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Milton D. Korman, Acting Corp. Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Acting Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent.

Before QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges, and CAYTON (Chief Judge, Retired).

CAYTON, Judge:

A real estate broker has brought here for review an order of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API